Cleveland vs Ping Irons: Used Price Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of used Cleveland and Ping irons based on 2,270 real eBay sales.
Cleveland
- Models
- 15
- Avg Used Price
- $306.36
- Total Sales
- 220
Ping
- Models
- 41
- Avg Used Price
- $407.11
- Total Sales
- 2,050
Cleveland Models
| Model | Avg Price | Range | Trend | Sales | Listings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zipcore XL | $537 | $236 – $837 | → Stable | 76 | 35 |
| Halo XL Full Face | $505 | $75 – $736 | → Stable | 42 | 30 |
| Launcher UHX | $244 | $65 – $370 | → Stable | 34 | 13 |
| 588 Altitude | $136 | $34 – $320 | → Stable | 29 | 9 |
| Launcher XL | $289 | $65 – $620 | → Stable | 12 | 0 |
| Launcher HB | $319 | $70 – $449 | → Stable | 10 | 0 |
| 588 MT | $209 | $100 – $360 | → Stable | 8 | 3 |
| Launcher CBX | $335 | $250 – $441 | → Stable | 4 | 0 |
| CBX Zipcore | $73 | $70 – $75 | → Stable | 3 | 0 |
| 588 CB Forged | $424 | $424 – $424 | → Stable | 1 | 6 |
| Launcher Turbo HB | $299 | $299 – $299 | → Stable | 1 | 0 |
| Launcher XL Halo | N/A | — | → Stable | 0 | 0 |
| Launcher XL2 | N/A | — | → Stable | 0 | 0 |
| Launcher XL Halo 2 | N/A | — | → Stable | 0 | 0 |
| Launcher XL2 Max | N/A | — | → Stable | 0 | 0 |
Ping Models
| Model | Avg Price | Range | Trend | Sales | Listings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| i230 | $645 | $130 – $1,055 | → Stable | 168 | 27 |
| Blueprint | $668 | $63 – $1,777 | → Stable | 158 | 53 |
| i530 | $805 | $100 – $1,375 | → Stable | 155 | 33 |
| i | $401 | $10 – $1,528 | → Stable | 129 | 36 |
| i525 | $549 | $120 – $900 | → Stable | 105 | 25 |
| G730 | $813 | $100 – $1,277 | → Stable | 100 | 18 |
| Blueprint S | $733 | $89 – $1,160 | → Stable | 91 | 7 |
| i59 | $498 | $195 – $999 | → Stable | 91 | 28 |
| i210 | $477 | $110 – $900 | → Stable | 90 | 27 |
| G710 | $594 | $86 – $1,088 | → Stable | 80 | 17 |
| i200 | $365 | $50 – $695 | → Stable | 80 | 27 |
| S55 | $328 | $100 – $600 | → Stable | 78 | 20 |
| i500 | $398 | $80 – $620 | → Stable | 74 | 29 |
| i20 | $246 | $12 – $427 | → Stable | 67 | 12 |
| Karsten | $147 | $19 – $350 | → Stable | 60 | 31 |
| iBlade | $380 | $175 – $720 | → Stable | 53 | 24 |
| G400 | $324 | $47 – $540 | → Stable | 43 | 0 |
| G10 | $172 | $38 – $315 | → Stable | 42 | 11 |
| G5 | $149 | $15 – $300 | → Stable | 42 | 10 |
| G15 | $243 | $30 – $541 | → Stable | 40 | 0 |
| i25 | $238 | $45 – $489 | → Stable | 40 | 1 |
| i15 | $192 | $20 – $725 | → Stable | 38 | 14 |
| G425 | $524 | $125 – $830 | → Stable | 35 | 7 |
| S56 | $214 | $98 – $425 | → Stable | 31 | 11 |
| G25 | $296 | $39 – $585 | → Stable | 30 | 0 |
| G410 | $353 | $85 – $850 | → Stable | 29 | 0 |
| G430 Irons | $762 | $549 – $1,000 | → Stable | 24 | 11 |
| G430 | $533 | $54 – $825 | → Stable | 24 | 0 |
| G Max | $306 | $70 – $580 | → Stable | 13 | 15 |
| Blueprint T | $705 | $425 – $1,000 | → Stable | 10 | 22 |
| G30 | $283 | $31 – $400 | → Stable | 10 | 0 |
| S57 | $221 | $160 – $308 | → Stable | 9 | 10 |
| G20 | $244 | $75 – $350 | → Stable | 7 | 0 |
| Anser Forged 2010 | $218 | $185 – $250 | → Stable | 2 | 1 |
| iE1 | $375 | $375 – $375 | → Stable | 1 | 0 |
| G430 HL Max | $257 | $257 – $257 | → Stable | 1 | 0 |
| G430 HL | N/A | — | → Stable | 0 | 0 |
| G | N/A | — | → Stable | 0 | 0 |
| G LE2 | N/A | — | → Stable | 0 | 0 |
| G LE3 | N/A | — | → Stable | 0 | 0 |
| G LE1 | N/A | — | → Stable | 0 | 0 |
The Verdict
Cleveland offers lower average used prices ($306.36 vs $407.11), while Ping has higher sales volume (2,050 total sales). Both brands have strong options — explore individual model pages for detailed condition-based pricing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are Cleveland or Ping irons more expensive used?
Ping irons average $357.46 used, while Cleveland average $224.67 — making Cleveland the more affordable option.
How many Cleveland vs Ping iron models are there?
We track 15 Cleveland and 41 Ping iron models with pricing data from verified eBay sales.
Which brand is the better value for used irons?
On average, Cleveland offers lower used prices. However, value depends on the specific model — check individual club pages for detailed pricing and condition-based breakdowns.